'Who can decide who is the worst of the worst and who dies?'

Sister Helen Prejean and her friend and collaborator, the actor Susan Sarandon, tell Alex Hannaford why they will never give up their mission to abolish the death penalty


A few months ago, 65-year-old Sister Helen Prejean travelled from her home in New Orleans to the Texas town of Huntsville, an hour north of Houston, to pay her last respects to a man she had only known for a few years. James Allridge, 41, had been sentenced to death in 1987 for the murder of a convenience-store clerk in Fort Worth. He had spent 17 years on death row.

"There is no touching, there are no hugs allowed there," she says. "The thing about this contrived, artificial event is that it's not like visiting someone in hospital. James Allridge was fully alive. The only thing that told me he was about to die was my mind and my watch, ticking away on my wrist."

Prejean first visited Allridge at Huntsville's redbrick prison, known as the Walls on account of its imposing fortress-like surround, on August 6. "He was the most gentle, insightful, loving man, and he really thought that because he had changed so much he could challenge the clemency process. He thought they wouldn't kill him." A film made by Allridge's defence counsel, containing interviews with former prison guards who testified that he was no longer a danger to society, was sent to the Texas Board of Paroles and Pardons. They were unswayed, and voted 6-0 in favour of proceeding with the execution.

Allridge was executed by lethal injection on August 26, and his story now forms part of Prejean's second book, The Death of Innocents, published by Random House next month. At Allridge's request, Prejean returned to Huntsville to witness the execution. Before he died, she says, he spoke to the witnesses gathered in the small room beyond the glass partition. "He sounded like he was making a little speech to friends," Prejean says. "He turned his eyes to his victim's family and said, 'I'm so sorry I have destroyed your life.' Then he turned to Christa, a friend who had come over from Switzerland, and said: 'To the moon and back. I came into this world in love and I leave this world in love.' He was so poised."

Since beginning her ministry work in 1981, Prejean has witnessed six executions. Famously, she became a pen pal to Patrick Sonnier, the convicted killer of two teenagers who was sentenced to die in the electric chair in Louisiana (and who was executed in 1984). This experience, and their relationship, were related in Prejean's 1993 book, Dead Man Walking, subsequently made into a film by Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon.

For the past 20 years, Prejean has continued to campaign against the death penalty, most recently against the execution of minors. The supreme court is currently hearing a case which will determine whether it is unconstitutional to implement the death penalty against juveniles. If the answer is yes, 75 could be freed from death row. (Between 1990 and 2003, the US executed more juveniles than the rest of the world combined. In the past four years, only four other countries have executed minors - Congo, China, Iran and Pakistan.) Prejean also founded a victims' advocacy group, Survive, based in New Orleans, which counsels death row inmates as well as the families of murder victims.

Prejean remains a close friend of Sarandon's, her collaborator on Dead Man Walking. When the actor first contacted her, more than a decade ago, Prejean had barely heard of her. "I didn't even know what she looked like, and she was suggesting turning my book into a mainstream film. It took her nine months to convince Tim Robbins." Robbins has since adapted the film for the stage, but before it reaches Broadway, Prejean has asked that the script be made available to US schools; the first performance will be at a high school in California.

It was Sarandon who first told Prejean about Allridge's case. "I stay with her and Tim when I'm in New York," says Prejean. "Susan showed me a note from James, and then in April this year she called me, saying he had been given an execution date. She had been writing to him for eight years. You get into the habit of writing to inmates, and when this happens you can't believe the state is actually going to kill them. And then she hit me with the bombshell - James had asked if I could be with him when he died." (Sarandon also visited Allridge shortly before his execution.)

The US occupies an uncomfortable position on the list of countries that still implement the death penalty. In fact, the list reads like a roll call of those nations America views - or once viewed - as hostile: North Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Lebanon, Syria. Since 1976, when executions resumed in the US after a nine-year moratorium, 69 people have been released from death row after evidence of their innocence emerged.

In 1996 a poll showed that 78% of Americans supported the death penalty. A 2004 Gallup poll found that this figure has now dropped to 64% - the lowest in 20 years. According to the Death Penalty Information Centre, public support for execution drops to below 50% when voters are offered alternative sentences such as life without parole.

"The disturbing thing," says Prejean, "is that although 38 states still have the death penalty on their books, over 80% of executions happen in the southern states where slavery was rife. In practice, the death penalty has always been a southern thing. Overwhelmingly, when a black person kills a white person, they are given the death penalty. There is no consistency. Look at the Green River Killer [Gary Leon Ridgway, who last year confessed to the murder of 48 women]. He didn't get sentenced to death. Who can decide who is the worst of the worst and who dies?"

In the Death of Innocents, Prejean recounts the stories of two death-row inmates she ministered to: Dobie Williams, a black man from Louisiana with an IQ of 65, and Joseph O'Dell, a 54-year-old white man from Virginia.

After witnessing Williams's execution, Prejean wrote an open letter to the Louisiana Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. "For the first time, I believe, I befriended a truly innocent man on death row," she wrote. "A 38-year-old indigent black man, I believe, was railroaded to death, for the death of a white victim in a small, racist southern town."

Prejean says that O'Dell asked for one evidentiary hearing and a DNA test so that he could prove his innocence of charges of rape and murder. "This was denied and after his death they destroyed the DNA so we will never know," she says. "After the Pope got involved, the governor's office received 10,000 faxes from the people of Italy. Then when Joseph died, the mayor of Palermo made him an honorary citizen and his body was shipped over to Italy and buried there."

Prejean is hopeful that the supreme court will rule against the continued execution of minors; a judgment is expected next spring. "If you are under 18 in the US you can't buy alcohol or tobacco or serve in the military and, ironically, you can't witness an execution. I think the Supreme Court will rule it unconstitutional for the same reasons it ruled against executing the mentally retarded: these people have no culpability for their actions. The rest of the world is watching. The US and Somalia are now the only countries that have not signed up to the Convention on the Rights of the Child."

Speaking from her home in New York, Sarandon says she believes she will see an end to the death penalty in her lifetime. "I have to believe that. It is a very tough thing to participate in that system - for the guards, the jurors, for everybody - because there are so many people involved. And I think that the jury in James Allridge's case was affected. A number of them asked that his sentence be commuted to life because they had not been given all the information, such as his background, when sentencing him.

"The thing that frightens me about the state of our dear nation and our world is this pre-emptive strike philosophy, and of violence as a means of solving everything, whether it is directed against the individual or a country. It is the elimination of all moderation. The most horrific thing about the death penalty - besides the fact that it is arbitrary and capricious and only affects those who have no money - is what it does to society."

She says she has never seen the death penalty as an effective deterrent. "It is archaic - there is a reason why it is outlawed everywhere else."

Sarandon spoke to Allridge over the phone on the afternoon of his execution. "When his last meal came he was a little shocked. He had really convinced himself there was a chance. I don't think he ate anything but had a cigarette instead. I was terrified for him and felt so useless. One of my kids said to me once, 'People don't die, because energy doesn't die, so you'll always be here with me.' When I'm feeling positive, I agree wholeheartedly. When I'm not, I'm not so sure."

· The Death of Innocents: An Eyewitness Account of Wrongful Executions by Sister Helen Prejean will be published by Random House in December.

pre-order it by clicking here and duckdaosu will receive a small donation! thanks.

Review
Advance praise for The Death of Innocents

“Once again, Sister Helen Prejean has brought her fierce intelligence, critical eye and moral passion to the subject of the death penalty. The Death of Innocents is also a detective story about the flawed ways of justice in America. Sister Helen’s voice has never been more pained, more insistent–or more worthy of our attention.”
–Jeffrey Toobin

“The Death of Innocents tells us with intellect, wisdom, and passion an awful truth about the administration of capital punishment in America that we won’t or don’t want to believe–procedure arbitrarily trumps substance, maddening incompetence undermines best intentions, racism shames everyone, and innocents are executed.”
–Barry Scheck

“In Dead Man Walking, Sister Helen Prejean helped us face the questions of whether it is morally right for governments to kill the guilty. In The Death of Innocents, she ups the ante of moral reckoning: In a hopelessly flawed system of justice, what if we’re killing innocent people along with the guilty? This important and well-written book is a deeply personal, compassionate, searingly honest eyewitness account of the death penalty in America. If you are not outraged by the sheer inhumanity and unfairness of state-sanctioned killing after reading this book, it might be time for you to run for governor of Texas.”
–Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon

“The Death of Innocents points out the flaws of the system that exist not only in Louisiana, Texas, and Virginia, but in all death penalty states. Abolition will be a reality someday, thanks to the efforts and works of Sister Helen Prejean.”
—George H. Ryan, former Governor of Illinois

“Sister Helen Prejean remains the preeminent witness to our most persistent barbarism. Her eloquent testimony on behalf of the condemned and the wrongly convicted–and the example of her fellowship–can inspire all Americans to find a better way.”
–Ted Conover

“Once more Sister Helen enables us to connect on a deeply human level with those on death row. But in The Death of Innocents she also explains the seismic change in Catholic teaching on the death penalty. Following Pope John Paul’s lead, Catholics everywhere now work for the abolition of this evil.”
–Bishop Thomas J. Gumbleton, Auxiliary Bishop, Archdiocese of Detroit

“Sister Helen Prejean has done it again–she has written a powerful and poignant book about those whose lives are taken wrongly by our system of criminal justice.”
–Cornel West

From the Inside Flap
Sister Helen Prejean was a little-known Roman Catholic nun from Louisiana when in 1993, her first book Dead Man Walking, challenged the way we look at the death penalty in America. It became a #1 New York Times bestseller and was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize. Now in The Death of Innocents, she takes us to the new moral edge of the debate on capital punishment: What if we’re killing the wrong man?

Dobie Gillis Williams, an indigent black man from rural Louisiana with an IQ of 65, was accused of a brutal rape and murder. Williams’s inept defense counsel, later disbarred for unethical practice for unrelated cases, allowed the prosecution’s incredibly contrived scenario of the crime to go unchallenged. Less than two years after Williams’s execution in January 1999, the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to kill a man so mentally disabled.

In 1986, Joseph Roger O’Dell was convicted of murder in Virginia despite highly circumstantial evidence from a jailhouse snitch. For twelve years, O’Dell sought DNA testing on the forensic evidence, which he claimed would exonerate him, but the courts refused. After his execution on July 23, 1997, the state destroyed the evidence. As a result, its conviction of O’Dell could never be scrutinized.

“The reader of this book will be the first ‘jury’ with access to all the evidence the trial juries never saw,” says Prejean, who accompanied both men to their executions. By using the withheld evidence to reconstruct the crimes for which these two men were convicted, Prejean shows how race, prosecutorial ambition, poverty, election cycles, and publicity play far too great a role in determining who dies and who lives.

Prejean traces the historical underpinnings of executions in this country, demonstrating that it is no accident that over 80 percent of executions in the past twenty-five years have been carried out in the former slave states. She also raises profound constitutional questions about an appeals system that decides most death cases on procedural grounds without ever examining their merits.

To date, 113 wrongfully convicted persons have been freed from death row. If constitutional protections–due process, assistance of counsel, and equal justice under law–are truly being respected, how is it possible that these people were convicted in the first place? And how can we accept a system so rife with error?

Sister Helen Prejean takes us with her on her spiritual journey as she accompanies two possibly innocent human beings to their deaths at the hands of the state. Prejean implores us to reflect on what is perhaps the core moral issue of the death penalty debate: Honorable people disagree about the justice of executing the guilty, but can anyone argue about the injustice of executing the innocent?