Wednesday, January 19, 2005
UK Iraqi abuse photos emerge as court martial continues
Jeannie Shawl at 7:43 AM
[JURIST] A British court martial has released over twenty pictures that seem to show British troops abusing Iraqi civilians. The photos emerged as three Royal Regiment of Fusiliers soldiers are facing nine charges for allegedly abusing looters detained at a camp outside Basra in May 2003. Responding to the photos [selected photos from BBC News], head of the British Army Gen. Sir Mike Jackson, condemned the alleged acts of abuse committed by UK soldiers in Iraq. In Jackson's statement , the general refused to comment on the ongoing court martial, but said "We condemn utterly all acts of abuse. Where there is evidence of abuse, this is immediately investigated." BBC News has more on the court martial and the abuse photos.
BBC NEWS SHOWN BELOW
"Britain's Abu Ghraib"
Shocking new photographs are revealed at a trial of three British soldiers accused of abusing Iraqi prisoners.
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Audrey Gillan
Jan. 19, 2005 | OSNABRUCK, Germany -- Images of British soldiers described as shocking and appalling that allegedly show the abuse of Iraqi prisoners were shown at a court-martial in Germany Tuesday as the long-awaited case of three members of the 1st Battalion of the Royal Regiment of Fusiliers got underway. Graphic photographs showing how soldiers forced Iraqis to strip bare and simulate oral and anal sex were put before a panel of seven officers. They also saw pictures of a grimacing Iraqi who had been strung up in a cargo net made from thick rope and hung from a forklift truck. Another showed a soldier, wearing just shorts and flip-flops, standing on an Iraqi man who was crouched in a fetal position on the ground.
The military court in Osnabruck began hearing the evidence against Corp. Daniel Kenyon, 33, and lance corporals Darren Larkin, 30, and Mark Cooley, 25, who face a total of nine charges relating to the alleged abuse of the Iraqis they had taken prisoner two weeks after the conflict was declared over in May 2003. Larkin pleaded guilty to a charge of battery but denied "disgraceful conduct of an indecent kind" after he was said to have forced two "unknown males" to undress in front of others.
Cooley has denied two offenses involving conduct to the prejudice of good order and military discipline for simulating punches and kicks to an Iraqi and allowing them to be photographed. He also denies disgraceful conduct of a cruel kind after he tied up an Iraqi and hung him from a forklift truck.
Kenyon denies all charges, including two of aiding and abetting a person to force two naked detainees to simulate a sex act.
If found guilty the men face prison sentences and dismissal from the army with disgrace. The case has been dubbed "Britain's Abu Ghraib," coming just one week after a U.S. court-martial sentenced one of its soldiers to 10 years for torturing Iraqis. U.S. Army Spc. Charles Graner was accused of stacking naked prisoners in a human pyramid and later ordering them to masturbate while other soldiers took photographs at the prison, near Baghdad.
Tuesday’s panel was presented with a collection of 22 photographs, taken from the cameras of five soldiers. The three accused soldiers had been part of an operation to stop Iraqi looters from stealing humanitarian aid from the British-run camp Bread Basket, half a mile west of Basra. The court heard that their commanding officer, Maj. Daniel Taylor, devised a plan, code-named Operation Ali Baba, aimed at rounding up thieves who had become a major problem at the camp.
The fusiliers were sent out in groups of four, armed with one SA-80 assault rifle and camouflage poles, to capture Iraqis and bring them back to the camp with the intention of "working them hard" to deter looting. The court heard that such an order was illegal and in contravention of the Geneva Convention.
Lt. Col. Nick Clapham of the Army prosecuting authority told the court that while such an order was against the law, "had these defendants done no more than what that order had envisaged, they would not be facing the charges that they face today.
"These charges are a long way outside of that order. It cannot be said that those photographs depict images that are anything other than shocking and appalling."
He said the soldiers had taken the men to their "hide" location at the far end of the camp to undertake "menial tasks." While there, the unknown Iraqis were forced to undress and perform simulated sexual acts while being photographed. One was beaten and suspended from a forklift truck. With regard to the pictures depicting sexual acts, he commented: "I do not say that the act of oral sex is actually taking place. It is very close, but it hasn't got to that stage."
The abused Iraqis pictured never came forward, and the allegations only came to light when another fusilier, Gary Bartlam, 20, took his film to be processed at a shop in his hometown of Tamworth. Police were called and the soldier was arrested. He was recently convicted at a separate court-martial, the details of which cannot be revealed because of reporting restrictions imposed by Judge Advocate Michael Hunter, who is also sitting on the current panel.
The army's legal advisor during the war, Lt. Col. Nicholas Mercer, told the court it had been made "absolutely clear" to soldiers that they must "treat persons who fall into their power humanely and protect them from the dangers of war." He said that looting in Iraq was "epidemic and psychotic" but soldiers had been briefed that prisoners should either be released or handed over to the Royal Military Police as soon as possible.
The soldiers face a maximum of two years in prison for each of the charges apart from the lesser charge of battery.
BBC NEWS ARTICLE available at http://www.duckdaotsu.org/011905-britabuse.html
(am having a great deal of trouble publishing on the blog today, its having tantrums)